Seabird bycatch
Many different species of seabird are affected by fishing,
with main groups for concern being albatrosses, petrels,
shearwaters and penguins. The impact of longlining, both demersal
and pelagic, has received greatest scrutiny. During longline
setting, seabirds take bait from hooks that are floating on or near
the surface. Seabirds can actually remove up to 70% of the bait
from longlines, which can be very costly to the industry. Some of
the seabirds taking bait will be caught on the hooks and are likely
to drown. Seabird bycatch has been identified as a significant
source of mortality for some species, particularly albatrosses,
where population declines have been linked directly to longlining
mortalities. Seabirds have also been caught in trawls, driftnets,
gillnets and by recreational fishers
Ghost fishing trammel net off
Wales. Tangled gadoid
probably lured the shag into the net. © Blaise
Bullimore/CCW
Commercial
longlining began in the 1950s, targeting tuna
and tuna-like species, and rapidly expanded through the 60s and 70s
in both the southern and northern hemispheres. Dermersal longlining
began in the 80s, targeting species such as the Patagonian
toothfish (
Dissostichus eleginoides) and further developed
in the 1990s targeting ling and hake. For pelagic longlines, there
are about 3000 baited hooks per set, on mainlines that may be over
100km in length. In contrast, the demersal longlines deploy up to
20,000 hooks per set on a mainline that is approximately 15km in
length. It should be noted, however, that some fisheries placing
large numbers of hooks in the water, actually have a smaller
seabird bycatch than other fisheries deploying less effort. Factors
such as type of gear used, time of day for setting, and the season
and area fished all affect the level of bycatch.
Much of the work examining seabird bycatch in longline
fisheries has focused on the southern hemisphere and the Southern
Ocean in particular. However, this method of fishing is expanding
in European waters and rates of seabird bycatch (0.16 to 0.69 birds
per 1000 hooks set) are comparable to those observed elsewhere.
Longliners in European waters have caught gannets (Sula
bassana), fulmers (Fulmarus glacialis), Manx
shearwaters (Puffinus yelkouan), Cory's shearwaters
(Calonectris diomedea), Balearic shearwaters (P.
mauretanicus), Audouin's gulls (Larus audouinni) and
yellow legged gulls (L. cachinnas).
Bycatch tends to be highest in the vicinity of major breeding
colonies, decreasing rapidly with distance from such sites. It has
been estimated that the Japanese drift net of the North Pacific
kills between 214500 and 76300 seabirds annually. However, in
recent years the industry has undergone major changes with the
increased use of mitigation measures. Mitigation measures
include:
- Night setting, which will reduce the bycatch of diurnal species
such as albatrosses. However, species that forage at night, e.g.
white-chinned petrels (Procellaria aequinoctialis), will
still be at risk.
- Discarding offal during line setting to lure birds away from
the baited hooks. This has been successful in some areas, but where
setting occurs over extended periods of several hours it becomes
impractical.
- Weighting lines to increase sink rate. This is suitable for
manual longlining only. When fishing in deep waters or poor
weather, however, the lines are often broken if weighted.
- Line shooters, which set lines with slack (i.e. no tension),
thereby increasing sink rate. This method has been found to half
the seabird bycatch.
- Dying the bait to make it less visible has reduced albatross
contact with baits by 90%. However, this is only feasible for those
fisheries using artificial baits.
- Underwater setting funnel or chute, which guides lines down to
a certain depth, significantly reduces seabird bycatch.
- Bird scaring devices, such as a line with suspended streamers
mounted on a pole at the vessel stern. Considered the most
effective in the North Atlantic fisheries.
However, it should be noted that in the late 1990s, increased
regulation, the high market price for tuna, billfish and toothfish,
and the introduction of quotas, has lead to an expansion of
illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) pelagic longline fishing.
These fishermen are highly unlikely to be using mitigation devices.
IUU fishing for Patagonian toothfish was estimated to have taken
between 36300 and 90100 seabirds between 2000 and 2001.
Further Reading:
Belda, E.J. & Sánchez, A., 2001. Seabird mortality on
longline fisheries in the western Mediterranean: factors affecting
bycatch and proposed mitigating measures. Biological
Conservation, 98, 357-363.
Bergin, A., 1997. Albatross and longling – managing
seabird bycatch. Marine Policy, 21, 63-72.
Gilman, E., Boggs, C. & Brothers, N., 2003.
Performance assessment of an underwater setting chute to
mitigate seabird bycatch in the Hawaii pelagic longline tuna
fishery.Ocean and Coastal Management, 46, 985-1010.
Goñi, R., 1998. Ecosystem effects of marine fisheries: an
overview. Ocean and Coastal Management, 40, 37-64.
Løkkeborg, S., 1998. Seabird bycatch and bait loss in
longlining using different setting methods. ICES Journal of
Marine Science, 55, 145-149.
Løkkeborg, S., 2003. Review and evaluation of three
mitigation measures – bird scaring line, underwater setting and
line shooter – to reduce seabird bycatch in the North Atlantic
longline fishery. Fisheries Research, 60, 11-16.
Løkkeborg, S. & Robertson, G., 2002. Seabird and
longline interactions: effects of a bird-scaring streamer line and
line shooter on the incidental capture of northern fulmers Fulmarus
glacialis. Biological Conservation, 106, 359-364.
Melvin, E.F., Parrish, J.K. & Conquest, L.L., 1999.
Novel tools to reduce seabird bycatch in coastal gillnet
fisheries. Conservation Biology, 13, 1386-1397.
Norman, F.I., 2000. Preliminary investigation of the
bycatch of marine birds and mammals in inshore commercial
fisheries, Victoria Australia. Biological Conservation, 92,
217-226.
Pierce, G.J., Dyson, J., Kelly, E., Eggleton, J.D.,
Whomersley, P., Young, I.A.G., Santos, M.B., Wang, J.J. &
Spencer, N.J., 2002. Results of a short study on by-catches and
discards in pelagic fisheries in Scotland (UK). Aquatic Living
Resources, 15, 327-334.
Ryan, R.G., Keith, D.G. & Kroese, M., 2002. Seabird
bycatch by tuna longline fisheries off southern Africa. South
African Journal of Marine Science, 24, 103-110.
Tuck, G.N., Polacheck, T. & Bulman, C.M., 2003.
Spatio-temporal trends of longline fishing effort in the
Southern Ocean and implications for seabird bycatch.
Biological Conservation, 114, 1-27.
Weimerskirch, H., Catard, A., Prince, P.A., Cherel, Y. &
Croxall, J.P., 1999. Foraging white-chinned petrels Procellaria
aequinoctialis at risk: from the tropics to Antarctica.
Biological Conservation, 87, 273-275.