Ghost fishing
Ghost fishing trammel net off
Wales. Tangled gadoid
probably lured the shag into the net. © Blaise
Bullimore/CCW
Fishing gear tends to be constructed from modern synthetic
fibres that are non-biodegrable. This means that snagged or lost
gear and torn fragments of net may continue to catch fish
indefinitely. This is termed ghost fishing. Gear can be lost for a
variety of reasons. For example, in northern Spain, set net
fisherman exploiting anglerfish (Lophius piscatorius) on
offshore grounds lost gear as a result of trawling activity in the
area, whilst inshore fishermen targeting seabream (Sparidae) lost
gear mainly as a result of bad weather.
A cycle of capture, decay and attraction tends to develop with
lost gear. For nets, catches initially decline as the increasing
weight of the catch causes the net to collapse. The decay of this
catch attracts scavenging organisms such as crustaceans, many of
which can be commercially important species. Once clear of fish
remains and scavengers, the net may disentangle, return to an
upright position and resume fishing. The longevity of this cycle
can vary, depending on environmental conditions. For example, a net
lost in shallow clear water will be rapidly fouled (i.e. algae and
other organisms will grow on it), which increases the net's
visibility and reduces its fishing capacity. Storms, swells and
wave action will also abrade nets, breaking them up. For example,
in the Irish Sea a net snagged between rocks continued to fish for
over a year whilst a similar net off the north west of Spain was
destroyed within a month due to the Atlantic swell.
Wrasse caught in lost pot. Note
damage
due to escape attempts
© Blaise Bullimore/CCW
Of greater concern are pots, creels and traps. These tend to be
constructed with the more durable materials and have a rigid
structure. Consequently, they can ghost fish for much longer
periods than nets. Pots tend to be baited when they are set. If the
pot is lost, in time the bait or lost catch will attract
scavengers, some of which are commercially important species. These
scavengers become entrapped and subsequently die, forming new bait
for other scavengers. A creel made from indestructible material can
therefore continue to fish indefinitely. As a result of this,
escape panels and biodegradable materials are being introduced to
reduce losses from ghost fishing in some areas.
The impact of ghost fishing depends upon the region and
fishery. For example, in the USA it has been estimated that $250
million of marketable lobster is lost annually to ghost fishing
whilst in the Bristol Bay crab fishery alone 31,600 pots were lost
over a two year period. The scale of the problem was such that
Canadian fisherman complained about it, resulting a grapnel survey
was conducted on Georges Bank from which 8% of tows recovered lost
gillnets (286 tows actually yielded a total 341 actively fishing
ghost nets). Lost tangle nets have been found to catch anglerfish
(Lophius budegassa and L.piscatorius) at similar
rates to commercially set tangle nets. This was, however, dependant
on the season. In contrast, in the Baltic Sea, capture rates of
lost cod gill nets were found to be 80% less than commercially set
nets within three months. They did, however, continue to fish for
over two years with a tendency to catch smaller individuals than
would be implied by their mesh size. In the Hawaiian lobster
fishery, the spiny lobster (Panulirus marginatus) and the
slipper lobster (Scyllarides squammosus) were able to exit
traps easily and ghost fishing was, consequently, not considered to
be a problem. In the Algarve (Portugal), ghost fishing of hake was
thought to be 0.5% of the total annual catch and considered a minor
problem in comparison to discarding.
Diver cleaning up lost angling
sea gear
© Blaise Bullimore/CCW
As well as the impact on commercial species, ghost fishing can
affect other marine species, notably birds and marine mammals. For
example, 99 seabirds were recovered from a 1.5km length of gill net
found south of the Aleutian Islands whilst, off Newfoundland, it
was estimated that over 100,000 marine birds and mammals were
killed in a four year period by ghost fishing. In the north east
Pacific, it was estimated that 15% of the mortality of young fur
seals (
Callorhinus ursinus) could be attributed to net
debris, with the average seal expecting to encounter 3 to 25 pieces
of net debris annually.
Further reading:
Bullimore, B.A., Newman, P.B., Kaiser, MJ., Gilbert, S.E.
& Lock, K.M., 2001. A study of catches in a fleet of
'ghost-fishing' pots. Fishery Bulletin, 99, 247-253.
Goñi, R., 1998. Ecosystem effects of marine fisheries: an
overview. Ocean and coastal Management, 40, 37-64.
Hebert, M., Miron, G., Moriyasu, M., Vienneau, R. &
DeGrace, P., 2001. Efficiency and ghost fishing of snow crabs
(Chionoecetes opilio) traps in the Gulf of St Lawrence.
Fisheries Research, 52, 143-153.
Humborstad, O.B., Lokkeborg, S., Hareide, N.R. & Furevik,
D.M., 2003. Catches of Greenland Halibut (Reinhardtius
hippoglossoides) in deepwater ghost-fishing gillnets on the
Norwegian continental slope. Fisheries Research, 64,
163-170.
Kaiser, M.J., Bullimore, B., Newman, P., Lock, K. &
Gilbert, S., 1996. Catches in 'ghost fishing' set nets.
Marine Ecology Progress Series, 145, 11-16.
Parrish, F.A. & Kazama, T.K., 1992. Evaluation of
ghost fishing in the Hawaiian lobster fishery. Fishery
Bulletin, 90, 720-725.
Revill, A.S. & Dunlin, G., 2003. The fishing capacity
of gillnets lost on wrecks and on open ground in UK coastal
waters. Fisheries Research, 64, 107-113.
Sancho, G., Puente, E., Bilbao, A., Gomez, E. & Arrgi, L.,
2003. Catch rates of monkefish (Lopius spp.) by lost tangle
nets in the Cantabrian Sea (northern Spain). Fisheries
Research, 64, 129-139.
Santos, M.N., Saldanha, H.J., Gaspar, M.B. & Monteiro,
C.C., 2003. Hake (Merluccius merluccius L., 1758) ghost fishing
by gill nets off the Algarve (southern Portugal). Fisheries
Research, 64, 119-128.
Tschernij, V. & Larsson, P.O., 2003. Ghost fishing by
lost cod gill nets in the Baltic Sea. Fisheries Research, 64,
151-162.