There were 467 sightings of marine
mammals (9,258 individuals) during seismic surveys in UK waters and
some adjacent areas in 2000. 12,069 hrs 40 mins were spent watching
for marine mammals during seismic surveys in 2000.
The most frequently seen species were white-sided and
white-beaked dolphins. Sperm whales, fin whales and minke whales
were also seen with moderate frequency, with lower numbers of
sightings of other species. Sightings of marine mammals peaked in
August, with most occurring to the west of Shetland and in the
northern North Sea, which reflected the location and timing of
surveys.
After controlling for potential sources of bias (location,
season, weather conditions) the sighting rate of white-sided
dolphins was found to be significantly lower during periods of
shooting (excluding during low power site surveys). Sighting rates
of fin whales, sperm whales, white-beaked dolphins, all baleen
whales combined and all dolphins combined did not differ
significantly with seismic activity.
After controlling for weather conditions at the time of the
sighting, white-beaked dolphins, white-sided dolphins and all
dolphins combined were found to be significantly further from the
airguns when they were firing than when they were silent (excluding
site surveys).
Some effects of seismic activity on the behaviour of marine
mammals were evident during seismic surveys (excluding site
surveys). There was a decreased tendency for cetaceans to engage in
feeding activity during periods of shooting. Positive interactions
of cetaceans with the survey vessel or its equipment occurred
significantly more often when the airguns were not firing. When all
baleen whales, all dolphins or all cetaceans were combined,
significantly fewer were found to be heading towards the vessel
during periods of shooting. Similarly, significantly more dolphins
were observed to be heading away from the vessel during periods of
shooting.
Sample sizes were lower for site surveys than for surveys with
larger airgun arrays. Where sample sizes were sufficient to permit
statistical testing for site surveys, no effects of seismic
activity on sighting rates of marine mammals or the distance they
remained from the airguns were found. However, some low level
disturbance was indicated on site surveys, as significantly fewer
animals were observed heading towards the vessel during periods of
shooting when all dolphins or all cetaceans were combined.
Sample sizes were low for many species, therefore the results
should be treated with caution.
Both notification and a report were received by JNCC for 76%
of seismic surveys taking place during 2000 (in blocks licensed in
the 16th, 17th and 18th rounds of offshore licensing).
The use of dedicated marine mammal observers had increased
slightly from previous years, but such observers were still only
used on a minority of surveys. Where JNCC requested specific types
of observers on surveys, these requests were complied with on 62%
of occasions for the primary observer, but on only 41% of occasions
for the secondary observer.
The duration of pre-shooting searches for marine mammals met
or exceeded the required minimum of 30 minutes for 79% of occasions
when the airguns were used during daylight hours in blocks where
compliance with the guidelines was a licence condition (16th, 17th
and 18th round blocks), which represents a decline in standards
from previous years. This decline was mainly due to inadequate
pre-shooting searches on site surveys, particularly where members
of ships' crews were responsible for marine mammal
observations.
Excluding site surveys, 95% of soft-starts met or exceeded the
required minimum duration of 20 minutes in blocks where compliance
with the guidelines was a licence condition. This represents an
increase in standards from previous years.
For site surveys, soft-starts were mostly inadequate. Only 37%
of soft-starts were of acceptable duration for site surveys in
blocks where compliance with the guidelines was a licence
condition.
Marine mammals were seen within 500 m of the airguns shortly
before shooting was due to commence on seven occasions in blocks
where compliance with the guidelines was a licence condition. The
guidelines require that in such circumstances shooting should be
delayed for a minimum of 20 minutes after the animals are last
seen; the subsequent soft-start should also last for a minimum of
20 minutes. On all seven occasions shooting was delayed for at
least 20 minutes, but on one occasion the subsequent soft-start was
too short. The proportion of delay situations where correct
procedures were followed had increased from previous years.
For surveys with large airgun arrays, the guidelines were
applied throughout all UK waters, not just in those blocks (16th,
17th and 18th round) where compliance with the guidelines is a
licence condition. There was little difference in the standard of
pre-shooting searches and soft-starts between blocks, and there was
one instance of shooting being delayed outside 16th, 17th and 18th
round blocks.
For site surveys there was a difference in the level of
compliance with the guidelines according to the location of the
survey. The standard of pre-shooting searches and soft-starts was
lower outside 16th, 17th and 18th round blocks.
The main area of concern regarding compliance with the
guidelines was site surveys. Standards of pre-shooting searches and
soft-starts were low, and reports from site surveys were often
missing or incomplete.
Differences were found in the level of compliance with the
guidelines according to the type of observer used. Dedicated marine
mammal observers provided the highest standard of pre-shooting
searches, while fishery liaison officers showed a gradual
improvement in the standard of their pre-shooting searches. Members
of ships' crews were the least likely to perform an adequate
pre-shooting search. There was considerable variation in the
standard of soft-starts on site surveys according to the type of
observer used; very few soft-starts were of adequate duration when
either fishery liaison officers or members of ships' crews were
acting as marine mammal observers.
There were also variations in the quality of observations
according to the type of observer used. Dedicated marine mammal
observers were more efficient at detecting marine mammals than
other personnel. Dedicated marine mammal observers also made fewer
errors when completing the recording forms, and their
identification skills were better than those of other personnel.
However, fishery liaison officers had improved both their ability
to detect marine mammals and their identification skills from
previous years. The ability of ships' crew members to detect marine
mammals was very low.
The use of trained, dedicated marine mammal observers is
recommended, both in terms of compliance with the requirements of
the guidelines and the provision of high quality data. Sole
reliance on members of ships' crews to carry out observations of
marine mammals is the least effective alternative.
A number of items for consideration when the Guidelines for
minimising acoustic disturbance to marine mammals from seismic
surveys are next revised are noted.