BTO Research Report No. 321
(2003)
Preliminary analyses of Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) mammal data
Newson, S.E. & Noble, D.G.
In 2001, a group of organizations interested in the surveillance and monitoring of mammal populations in the UK met to discuss priorities and possible approaches. This group, currently informally known as the UK Mammal Network, identified a number of schemes (currently in operation or in the planning) stage that could be integral components of a UK-wide mammal monitoring strategy. One of the schemes is the multi-species mammal monitoring carried out by many participants in the BTO/RSPB/JNCC Breeding Bird Survey (BBS). Although summaries of the mammal component are regularly reported in the annual BBS reports (see Noble et al. 2001), there have, to date, been relatively few analyses of these data or attempts to identify population trends. This report provides an overview of the BBS mammal data collected to date, presents some preliminary population trends for mammal species monitored in sufficient numbers, and outlines approaches for future analyses and reporting of these data. This is NOT intended to be an exhaustive report on UK mammal trends as revealed by the BBS. Clearly, there is considerable scope for more comprehensive examination of these data, but that would require much greater effort than was possible in this contract.
Executive Summary
1. In 1995 the scope of the BTO/RSPB/JNCC Breeding Bird Survey
(BBS) was expanded to also record British mammals. This was the
first multi-species, annual mammal survey to be carried out in the
UK, with the focus on medium to large-sized easily identifiable
species, although observers can record any mammal species seen or
known to be present. Summaries of these data are regularly reported
through the annual BBS reports, although there have been few
analyses of these data or attempts to calculate population trends.
In this report, we assess the effectiveness of the BBS for
monitoring UK mammal populations and of detecting significant
changes in abundance or distribution..
2. Preliminary analyses of BBS mammal data for 1995-2000
demonstrates that national populations of Brown Hare,
Mountain/Irish Hare, Grey Squirrel, Red Fox, Red Deer, Fallow Deer,
Roe Deer, Reeve's Muntjac and Rabbit can be monitored by this
survey. Of these, the Roe Deer increased significantly over this
period, whilst all remaining species (with the exception of Reeve's
Muntjac), exhibited significant inter-year variation during this
period. As expected, the BBS field methodology is not effective for
monitoring bats, most mustelids, small mammals, and cetaceans and
rare or highly localised species (e.g. Red Squirrel, Wildcat or
Chinese Water Deer).
3. For a number of species, there are insufficient data to
calculate reliable indices of abundance, but a large amount of
indirect information on presence/absence from field signs or local
knowledge of their presence in that year. For example, Badger,
Mole, Hedgehog and Brown Rat. For these species, the change in
presence on BBS was modelled to see whether there were sufficient
data to produce reliable indices of abundance. Whilst the sample
was adequate to do this, there were a number of problems with the
resulting indices. Indices calculated for the first year or so may
reflect awareness by the observer of the presence of the species
and changes in the survey form may explain an apparent increase in
these species in 1998. However, this is a method that may become
more useful as data from further years are collected. This method
may also be most appropriate for herding deer species, such as Red,
Fallow and Sika Deer for which there was a large variance
associated with indices based on counts and where modelling
presence/absence may provide a more accurate means of monitoring
change in their populations.
4. As with many analyses there is a conflict between
maximising the sample size required to identify change with
confidence and narrowing down the area to understand the exact
pattern of change. In this study, we examine the use of count data
to compare population trends for five species for which there was
sufficient data (Brown Hare, Rabbit, Grey Squirrel, Red Fox and Roe
Deer) within three broad regions. Of these, the Brown Hare showed a
significantly larger decline in the southwest than in the north and
southeast of Britain. Further analyses could examine pair-wise
differences between regions for more species where the sample size
in one region is limiting and additional analyses could change the
boundaries of regions to better understand trends in different
geographic areas.
5. Whilst data for a large proportion of species recorded by
the BBS are insufficient to calculate indices of abundance or
presence/absence, these data do provide important information on
their distribution and relative abundance. Also, because observers
record habitat information, we may be able to identify the habitat
requirements of these species – essential for conservation
initiatives and useful for planning of further targeted
studies.
6. As mentioned above, the collection of habitat data on BBS
squares is important for our understanding of species population
trends. Trends may be unrelated to habitat, but could be directly
related to a particular change in a specific habitat in which they
occur. In this study, we calculate separate habitat-specific
indices for four species (Brown Hare, Rabbit, Grey Squirrel and Red
Fox) in two or more dominant habitats. These suggest that Brown
Hare declined on farmland between 1995 and 2000, whilst Rabbit also
declined on farmland, but increased on grassland over this period,
although abundance fluctuated widely between years. Abundance of
Grey Squirrel also fluctuated over this period, whilst the Red Fox
declined in urban areas but increased on farmland.
You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view this
document.
Please cite as: Newson, S.E. & Noble, D.G., (2003), BTO Research Report No. 321