News | Jobs | Publications | About JNCC | Accessibility | Contacts
Home  >   Marine  >   Seabirds and Seaduck  >   Seabird 2000  >   Species monitored  >   Little Tern
Little Tern vignette

Seabird 2000

 
LittleTern Sterna albifrons
 
Maps and Figures
 
The  following was adapted from original text by Georgina Pickerell in Seabird Populations of Britain and Ireland (with permission from A&C Black, London).
 
The Little Tern is the smallest species of tern breeding in Britain and Ireland. They nest exclusively on the coast in well-camouflaged shallow scrapes on sand and shingle beaches, spits or inshore islets. Little terns do not forage far from their breeding site, which dictates a necessity for breeding close to shallow, sheltered feeding areas where they can easily locate the variety of small fish and invertebrates that make up their own and their chicks' diet. Although colonies may be found around much of the coastline, breeding is concentrated in the south and east of England, where the species' preference for breeding on beaches also favoured by people makes it vulnerable to disturbance.
 
Following a decline during the 19th century, the Little Tern population in Britain increased in size during the early 20th century, peaking in the 1930s. Thereafter, numbers once again fell and Operation Seafarer (1969–70) estimated the British and Irish population to be 1,900 pairs. Numbers then peaked in the mid-1970s and then went into a long-term decline, reaching an all-time low in 1998. The decline was most severe at colonies along the coast of the English Channel, but was not restricted to this region, indicating that the problem was more widespread.
 
Survey coverage
 
Complete coverage of Little Tern colonies was achieved in Britain and Ireland during Seabird 2000, as in Operation Seafarer (1969-70) and the SCR Census (1985-88). Little Terns, like other tern species, show a low degree of site fidelity from one year to the next, in response to predation, disturbance or habitat change. This is such a great problem that in order to gain an accurate national estimate of Little Tern numbers, a simultaneous census was planned to cover all colonies in Britain within a single year. During Seabird 2000, 93% of the population in Britain were counted in 2000. This was a marked improvement on the SCR Census when counts were spread over four years, with 13% of the British population counted in 1985, 21% in 1986, 63% in 1987 and the remaining 3% in 1988. In the Republic of Ireland, Seabird 2000 surveys were conducted in 1999 in Louth and Dublin, in 2000 in Mayo and Wexford and in 2001 in Wicklow. There are no known colonies of Little Terns in Northern Ireland. Counts from all other admin areas in Ireland were taken from the 1995 All Ireland Tern Survey (Hannon et al. 1997) and these constituted 65% of colonies and 48% of AONs in Ireland (1995-2001). Movements between admin areas in successive years could have lead to an over or underestimate of the population size in Ireland. For the SCR Census Lloyd et al. (1991) used counts of Little Terns from the 1984 All Ireland Tern Survey (Whilde 1985) together with more recent counts from 1985-88 when they existed. This probably led to an overestimate of the population, therefore, for the SCR Census results in Table 1, only counts from the All Ireland Tern Survey in 1984 (which were less likely to be affected by movement of birds between colonies) were used. However, any errors/biases in the estimate for Ireland would have only a small effect on the accuracy of the total population estimate for Britain and Ireland, since only 10% of the population bred in here during Seabird 2000.
 
Census Methods
 
The prescribed count unit for Little Terns during Seabird 2000 was the apparently occupied nest (AON). Little Terns usually breed at low densities and have inconspicuous nests and camouflaged eggs and chicks. Thus, counts of fully formed nests containing eggs and chicks made during systematic searches from within the colony usually underestimate the number of AONs present. AONs are much more conspicuous when an adult is in attendance, either incubating, brooding or feeding chicks. Thus, counts of AONs are best made from a good vantage point, far enough away from the colony as not to cause any disturbance to attending adults. In Britain during Seabird 2000, 81% of AONs were counted from a vantage point, 9% were counted from within the colony and the remaining 10% were estimated from counts of individuals attending the colony (no information on methods was available from the All Ireland Tern survey). During the SCR Census (1985-88), count methods were not recorded, but 97% of AONs were counted directly, with only 3% estimated from counts of individuals. Counts of individuals were performed when there was no suitable vantage point and the colony could either not be accessed or the level of disturbance caused by doing so was deemed unjustifiable by the surveyor. During both censuses, counts of individuals were divided by 1.5 to give an estimate of AONs (Bullock & Gomersall 1981). The conversion of counts of individuals to counts of AONs is prone to error resulting from inclusion of attending non-breeders and the variation in attendance of parents to the nest depending on time of day and season. Furthermore, the correction factor was devised for Arctic Terns in the Northern Isles rather than Little Terns.
 
The recommended count period for Seabird 2000 was from mid-May to the end of June, coinciding with the peak nesting period. Pairs that failed or deserted early in the season may have been missed during surveys, and those that moved to other colonies may have been counted twice. In Britain, during Seabird 2000, 40% of the population were counted within the recommended dates, 28% were outside and no date was recorded for 31% of counts, compared with 31%, 14% and 55% respectively during the SCR Census. In Ireland, 70% of the population were counted within the recommended dates during Seabird 2000, but dates were not available for counts made during the All Ireland Tern Survey in 1984 that were incorporated into the SCR Census.
While the similarity in methods employed in both the SCR Census and Seabird 2000 ensures a valid comparison of their population estimates, the apparent population trend from a comparison of two such widely spaced surveys may be misleading. This is because the proportion of adult Little Terns choosing to nest in any one year does fluctuate. Thus more accurate trends are obtained from more frequently conducted counts (e.g. annually). Annual monitoring of the size of Little Tern Colonies has been conducted in Britain since 1969. The colonies monitored currently hold about two-thirds of the British Little Tern population.
 
Census Methods     Data Processing and Analysis     References     Seabird 2000
 
Image appears courtesy of Ian Rendall ©, is subject to international copyright law and may not be reproduced in any form whatsoever.
| Home | Site Map | Search | Legal | Feedback | List Access Keys |