News | Jobs | Publications | About JNCC | Accessibility | Contacts
Home  >   Marine  >   Seabirds and Seaduck  >   Seabird 2000  >   Species monitored  >   Atlantic Puffin
Atlantic Puffin vignette

Seabird 2000

 

Atlantic Puffin Fratercula arctica
 
Maps and Figures
 
The  following was adapted from original text by Mike P. Harris and Sarah Wanless in Seabird Populations of Britain and Ireland (with permission from A&C Black, London).
 
Introduction
 
The Atlantic Puffin is the most instantly recognizable and popular of all North Atlantic seabirds. It breeds in the North Atlantic and the adjacent Arctic Ocean, with strongholds in Iceland and Norway, with around 10% in Britain and Ireland, where it is the second most abundant breeding seabird. Puffins are pelagic and we are still largely ignorant of how they spend their time away from the colony. Atlantic Puffins from north western Britain and Ireland disperse widely outside the breeding season, as far as Newfoundland in the west and the Canary Islands to the south and even into the Mediterranean as far east as Italy. In contrast, most birds from eastern Britain remain within the North Sea though in recent decades some have dispersed as far as the Bay of Biscay.
 
Atlantic Puffins typically nest underground in burrows dug in the soil of offshore islands, where such habitat is in short supply, they nest among boulder screes or at low densities in cracks in sheer cliffs rather like Black Guillemots or Razorbills. Puffins are highly colonial and most colonies occur where the nesting birds are safe from mammalian predators. However, even in mid-summer, a colony can appear deserted during the middle of the day since most birds are either down burrows or out at sea feeding. At other times awe-inspiring numbers can be seen standing on the slopes, bobbing around on the sea or flying in vast wheels over the colony. Chicks are fed on small fish that the adult carries cross-wise in its beak. In Britain and Ireland the commonest prey is the lesser sandeel, followed by sprat, herring and a wide range of small juvenile gadoid fish. Fish are caught by underwater pursuit and a bird can catch several during a dive.
 
Census Methods
 
Puffins are censused by counting apparently occupied burrows or individual birds attending the colony area. The former is the preferred method and during both Seabird 2000 and the SCR Census (1985-88) most of the larger colonies were estimated in this way. An apparently occupied burrow (AOB) is one with signs of current use such as fresh digging, squirts of droppings radiating from the entrance, hatched eggshells, broken vegetation or dropped fish in the entrance. Puffin burrows can generally be distinguished from rabbit burrows since the latter are usually larger and have piles of soil and pellet-like droppings at the entrance. However, there is no easy way to separate a burrow of a Manx Shearwater from that of an Atlantic Puffin. Mixed colonies of these species are relatively uncommon, but where the species coexist, for example in southwest Britain and Ireland, tape playback of Manx Shearwater calls has recently been used to distinguish burrows of the two species. Counts of AOBs are best made before or during the laying period, when birds are digging or cleaning out their burrows and when the vegetation is short. However, acceptable counts can be made at any time from late April to early August as long as the vegetation does not obscure burrow entrances.
 
At some colonies such as those on the Farne Islands and Coquet (both in Northumberland), the Isle of May (E. Fife), North Rona (Western Isles) and Ynys Gwylan Fawr (Gwynedd) all, or most, of the AOBs were counted and here the main source of error would be the misclassification or overlooking of burrows (On the Isle of May, this was found to result in an underestimate of 2%). For logistical reasons such complete coverage is impossible to achieve at many colonies. In such situations the density of burrows must be determined in sample plots, the area of the colony estimated and the measures combined to get an estimated population size. This approach is associated with some major sources of error. The first is a statistical problem resulting from scaling-up to estimate population size since this assumes that the sampled areas were representative of the whole colony. An attempt was made to assess the precision of the estimates for St Kilda and Sule Skerry (Orkney), in the former there was a 95% chance that the true population was within 12% of the estimate, in the latter the figure was 20%. The second error is associated with determining the area of the colony, either by direct measurement or by the use of aerial photographs. To date no rigorous check of this error has been attempted at any colony in Britain or Ireland.
 
Where birds nest under boulders (e.g The Shiants, Western Isles), in mixed colonies with Manx Shearwaters (Skomer and Skokholm, Dyfed), in completely inaccessible places (Foula, Shetland) or at low densities along stretches of cliffs (mainland colonies), counts of burrows are impractical. In these cases there is no alternative but to count birds attending the colony. Several different approaches were used during Seabird 2000. On the Shiant Islands and at Hermaness (Shetland) counts of birds were converted to AOBs by making simultaneous calibration counts of birds ashore in areas where the number of AOBs was known. On Fair Isle (Shetland) counts were converted to pairs (taken as equal to AOBs) by concurrent observations of known numbers of colour-ringed adults seen ashore. The ratio of birds to AOBs obtained on Fair Isle was also used to convert counts of birds to AOBs on Foula (Shetland). On Skomer and Skokholm, all adults present on land and on the sea below the colony were counted on several evenings of peak attendance early in the season, when only breeding individuals would have been present, and the maximum count was taken. Where time constraints prevented such a detailed approach, observers were asked to make counts of birds on land, close inshore or in the air during April and May, before substantial numbers of immatures begin to attend the colony, preferably in the evenings or during foggy conditions when maximum numbers of breeding adults are usually present. The high variability of such counts both within and between days, and the lack of any obvious factor influencing attendance, means that such counts are of rather limited value in assessing breeding numbers, but they do at least give some idea of colony size.
 
In Seabird 2000 the majority of colonies were surveyed during 1999-2002. However, the large colonies on Sule Skerry (Orkney), Mingulay (Western Isles) and Isle of May (Harris & Wanless 1998) were surveyed in 1998 and that on the Farne Islands was surveyed in 2003. The Seabird 2000 population estimate for Atlantic Puffins on Eilean Mor, the largest of the Flannan Isles (Western Isles) consisted of a sample count of AOBs in the densest part of the colony conducted in 1998, added to a complete count of AOBs on the rest of the island conducted in 2001.
 
For the calculation of total populations, some arbitrary decisions had to be made to allow the combination of counts of individuals and AOBs. The previous practice of assuming that one individual corresponded to one AOB (Cramp et al. 1974, Lloyd et al. 1991) was continued and applied to counts from Seabird 2000, Operation Seafarer (1969-70) and the SCR Census (1985-88). However, this approximation may well result in a serious underestimate of the number of AOBs. On Skomer and Skokholm, counts were made during known peaks of attendance prior to egg laying, during both Seabird 2000 and the SCR Census. Counts made at both colonies during both censuses were divided by 1.5 assuming that 75% of all breeding adults were present.
 
In both the SCR Census and Seabird 2000, 83% of the total population estimates came from counts or estimates of AOBs. In the SCR Census 65% of the counts of individual birds came from the preferred counting months and in Seabird 2000 the figure was 73%. The overall estimates of the two surveys should be broadly comparable, however, detailed comparisons of numbers in the largest colonies (Table 2) recorded in the SCR Census and Seabird 2000 were restricted to colonies where counting methodologies was similar in both censuses.
 
Census Methods     Data Processing and Analysis     References     Seabird 2000
 
Image appears courtesy of Ian Rendall ©, is subject to international copyright law and may not be reproduced in any form whatsoever.
| Home | Site Map | Search | Legal | Feedback | List Access Keys |