Development of a hierarchical classification
It was considered essential to develop a hierarchical
classification structure in which broader, higher types in the
classification could be more finely divided to support more
detailed use. The development of the hierarchy comes from both a
top-down and a bottom-up approach:
Taking the marine environment as a whole, it can be
sub-divided into a series of broad habitat categories, based
largely on their physical character as described here. At the very
broadest level, differentiation can be made between rock and
sediment habitats, and between those on the shore (intertidal) and
those in the subtidal or deep ocean. These high-level divisions can
be further subdivided on the basis of different types of sediment
(e.g. gravel, mud), different degrees of wave exposure on rocky
coasts (exposed, sheltered) and varying depth bands below the low
water mark (e.g. shallow water where light penetrates, deeper water
with little light). Such broad-scale differences in habitat
character are readily understood by non-specialists and provide
classification types that are easily mapped; however, they also
have ecological relevance as they reflect major changes in habitat
character upon which species depend (see above).
The top-level types depicted in the primary habitat matrix
(
Table 3) show
levels 2 and 3 in the hierarchical classification. It is important
to note that these top-level categories were developed after
consideration of how best to classify biological data at the lower
end of the classification.
Field survey, whether on the shore or in the subtidal, reveals
that different places support different communities of species. The
precise combination of species and their relative abundance varies
from place to place and is dependent both on environmental
characteristics and upon interactions between species. Visits to
different sites that have similar environmental characteristics,
such as sediment type and depth, show certain levels of similarity
in their species composition. Multivariate analysis of the data
from field surveys (e.g. grabs, diver observations) groups these
data into clusters that have similar character – this forms the
basis of defining the types at the lower end of the classification
(levels 5 and 6). These can themselves be grouped into higher types
with similar character (level 4), thus forming the basis for the
bottom-up approach to development of the classification based on
real field sample data.
The two approaches have been merged together into a single
hierarchy, thus catering for broad-scale application in management
and mapping and fine-scale application for detailed survey,
monitoring and scientific study. The levels can be differentiated
in relation to their degree of biological distinctiveness, to the
ability to discriminate types by various methods of remote and
in situ sampling, to the ease of recognition by workers
with differing skill levels and to the end use of the
classification for conservation management at various scales.
Six levels in the hierarchy have thus been developed, equating
directly to the levels in the EUNIS classification:
Level 1: Environment (marine) – A
single category is defined within EUNIS to distinguish the marine
environment from terrestrial and freshwater habitats.
Level 2: Broad habitats - These are
extremely broad divisions of national and international application
for which EC Habitats Directive Annex I habitats (e.g. reefs,
mudflats and sandflats not covered by seawater at low tide) are the
approximate equivalent.
Level 3: Main habitats - These serve
to provide very broad divisions of national and international
application which reflect major differences in biological
character. They are equivalent to the intertidal Sites of Special
Scientific Interest (SSSI) selection units (for designation of
shores in the UK) (Joint Nature Conservation Committee 1996) and
can be used as national mapping units.
Level 4: Biotope complexes - These
are groups of biotopes with similar overall physical and biological
character. Where biotopes consistently occur together and are
relatively restricted in their extent, such as rocky shores and
very near-shore subtidal rocky habitats, they provide better units
for mapping than the component biotopes, better units for
management and for assessing sensitivity than the individual
biotopes. They are relatively easy to identify, either by
non-specialists or by coarser methods of survey (such as video or
rapid shore surveys), thereby offering opportunities for data
collection by a wide range of people and without recourse to
specialist species identification skills.
Level 5: Biotopes - These are
typically distinguished by their different dominant species or
suites of conspicuous species. On rocky substrata, most should be
readily recognised by workers with a basic knowledge of marine
species, although quantitative sampling will be necessary in many
of the sediment types. The vast majority of available biological
sample data are attributable to this level (or the sub-biotope
level), which is equivalent to the communities defined in
terrestrial classifications such as the UK National Vegetation
Classification (e.g. Rodwell ed. 1995). Intertidal and
subtidal sediment biotopes may cover very extensive areas of shore
or seabed.
Level 6: Sub-biotopes - These are
typically defined on the basis of less obvious differences in
species composition (e.g. less conspicuous species), minor
geographical and temporal variations, more subtle variations in the
habitat or disturbed and polluted variations of a natural biotope.
They will often require greater expertise or survey effort to
identify.
The primary habitat matrix (
Table 3) provides an overview of levels 2 and 3
in the classification. Matrices also been created for each
broad habitat, showing the relationship of biotopes and
sub-biotopes to key environmental factors (click
here for
more). For each broad habitat, a hierarchy structure diagram
showing the relationship between units at the higher and lower
hierarchical levels has been created in Excel™
(click
here for more). A fully expandable
hierarchical list of the whole classification system, from broad
habitats to sub-biotope level, is available
here. To make
navigation through the hierarchical classification structure
easier, a standard colour scheme is used throughout this
website, with a single colour for each hierarchical level.