News | Jobs | Publications | About JNCC | Accessibility | Contacts
Home  >   Species  >   Mammals  >   Tracking Mammals Partnership  >   Surveillance and Monitoring Programme  >   Single Species Schemes

Single Species SchemesTracking Mammals Partnership logo

 

 
 

National Otter SurveysOtter Lutra lutra© Paul Glendell/English Nature

 

A series of national otter surveys was initiated in 1977-78 in response to a growing concern for the status of the otter in the UK. The surveys have been carried out at approximately seven year intervals at a country level, with four surveys now completed in England, Wales and Scotland and two surveys carried out in Northern Ireland during that time. The aim of the surveys was to monitor changes in otter distribution over time. A further aim, since 1995, has been to assess whether otter Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) targets on population spread were being achieved. These surveys have predominantly used paid and fully-trained surveyors to carry out the work, with the surveys usually taking two years to complete. This set of repeated surveys provides the best historical data set for any mammal species in the UK and provides a clear illustration of changes in the distribution of otters across the UK.
 
Participating organisations: The surveys have been run and funded by a variety of organisations, listed here under the respective countries:
 
England: the fourth survey (2000-02) was run by the Environment Agency (EA) and the Wildlife Trusts and funded by the EA, English Nature (now known as Natural England), Water UK, Biffaward and local water companies. The third survey (1991-94) was run and funded by the Vincent Wildlife Trust (VWT). The first and second surveys (1977-79 and 1984-86) were run and funded by the former Nature Conservancy Council (NCC).
 
Scotland: the fourth otter survey of Scotland was run and funded by Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH), with a funding contribution from Scottish Water. The first (1977-79), second (1984-85) and third (1991-94) surveys were run and funded by the VWT.
 
Wales: the fourth survey (2002) was run by the EA and the Wildlife Trusts and was funded by the EA, Countryside Council for Wales (CCW) and Welsh Water. The second and third surveys (1984-85 and 1991, respectively), were run and funded by the VWT. The first survey (1977-78) was run and funded by the NCC.
 
Northern Ireland: the Second Otter Survey of Northern Ireland (2003) was funded by the Environment and Heritage Service (EHS). The first Otter Survey of Ireland (1980-81) was run and funded by the VWT.
 
Methods: the standard otter survey method was recommended, which involved walking 600 m transects along river banks in each 1 km2 site, along main rivers and coast or lake shores. Sites were situated at 5-8 km intervals. Surveyors looked for otter spraints (droppings) and also for signs of mink. The method adopted varied slightly between surveys; surveyors were required to walk the full 600m in some surveys, whereas in others they were asked to stop as soon as otter spraints were found. This means that mink data were only collected in some surveys, resulting in rather patchy and not necessarily reliable information for mink.
 
Site coverage: UK wide, carried out separately in the four countries, using a stratified sample of sites across the UK, following a stratification of the National Grid. Surveys were conducted at the 10 km square level, and sites were not randomly selected, so the surveys are best regarded as providing information about distribution at the 10 km square level. Within each 10 km square, sites to be visited were selected as being accessible and likely places to find signs of otter activity, typically road bridges and the confluences of watercourses.
 
In England, every 10 km square in alternate 50 km squares was surveyed.
 
In Scotland every 10 km square was covered in the first survey with a reduced sample in the second and third surveys. The fourth survey covered a subset of the original sites, rather than the whole country, based on recommendations for reducing site coverage while retaining survey power (Brewer et al., 2002).
 
In Wales every 10 km square has been covered in all four surveys.
 
In the most recent surveys, 3,327 sites were covered in England, approximately 1,363 sites in Scotland 1,097 sites in Wales and 622 sites in Northern Ireland.
 
Survey power: this series of national level surveys was not originally designed to provide population trend information, but to provide presence/absence data and measure the rate of change in the distribution of the species over time. The report by Brewer et al. (2002) recommended a stratified sampling approach for the fourth survey of Scotland that would detect a 25% decline in otter distribution with 90% power.
 
Latest information:
Fourth Scotland survey report - (awaiting report from Scottish Natural Heritage)
The data from the surveys are available through the NBN Gateway  
A full list of otter survey reports can be found in the Reports section
 
 

The National Dormouse Monitoring Programme (NDMP)


Run by  People’s Trust for Endangered Species (PTES), with statistical input from Royal Holloway, University of London (RHUL); Funded by PTES and English NatureHibernating Dormouse Muscardinus avellarianus © Paul Bright (now known as Natural England)

 
The distributional range of the common dormouse declined by about 50% in Britain during the 20th Century. The National Dormouse Monitoring Programme was set-up in 1991 with the aim of monitoring changes in dormouse abundance. The survey covers a wide range of sites where the species is known to exist.
 
Methods: annual surveillance of dormouse sites across the known range of the species in GB since 1991. Trained and licensed volunteers are asked to check at least 50 nest boxes in each site during a 10 day period each month, commencing in May and ending in October. As a minimum, nest boxes are checked in June and October. Volunteers collect information on number of dormice seen in each nest box and body weight, sex, breeding condition and whether individuals are active or torpid. Volunteers and data are coordinated centrally by PTES. The survey assesses annual variation in breeding success and changes in population density across habitats and regions.
 
Site coverage: England and Wales. There are now 243 sites registered in the NDMP and approximately 477 volunteers participating each year, covering about 25% of known dormouse sites in Britain. The network will be increased to around 300 sites in the near future to include sites in Forest Enterprise conifer plantations.
 
Survey power: the sample sizes are large enough to detect Amber Alert changes (25% over 25 years) nationally and Red Alert (50% over 25 years) regionally. Volunteers are also being asked to record all other small mammal species seen in the nest boxes and if possible count, sex and weigh the specimens, as for the dormouse. Data from this additional survey are currently being assessed.
 

Latest information:

NDMP Newsletter Spring 2004 (contains trend results for 10 years from 1993-2003)
 
 

Monitoring Water Voles at National Key Sites

 

Run by PTES/MTUK, RSPB, EA and English NatureWater vole Arvicola terrestris © Johnny Birks/VWT (now known as Natural England)
 
The Water Vole National Key Sites project aims to select a number of nationally important areas for water voles (many are NNRs), make sure they are being managed correctly and institute long-term monitoring. Associated scientific studies will look at why the water voles in these areas do not appear to fall ‘victim’ to mink and also look at ways of extending the water vole populations into the surrounding areas.
 
Methods: at each site a minimum of 12 and a maximum of 24 100 m transects have been selected, distributed as evenly as possible across the site. Each transect begins or ends at a recognisable landmark so it is possible to monitor the same transects each year to obtain an index of water vole abundance based on latrine counts. A transect covers one bank/edge only of a water body and is searched metre by metre for latrines and other signs of water vole activity, which are recorded on a standard data sheet. Evidence of mink and otter are also recorded.
 
Site coverage: there are currently 14 National Key Sites throughout England and Wales. All sites fulfil the following four criteria: they are a known and probably sustainable refuge from mink; are likely to be major sources of water voles to recolonise surrounding areas; currently have habitat quality that is near optimal for water voles or where management could quickly be adjusted to make it so; and have long term secure land tenure, habitat management and (if needed) mink control.
 
Survey power: Not assessed at present.
 
 

The Mammal Society's Water Shrew Survey

 
Run by The Mammal Society; Funded by the EAVolunteers looking for signs of water shrews© Angela Gall, The Mammal Society
 
The Mammal Society's Water Shrew Survey is a pilot study (2004-2006) involved over 1,000 volunteers. The main aim of the survey was to increase knowledge of water shrew distribution with the ultimate aim of establishing a monitoring scheme for this species. Further aims included establishing habitat requirements and preferences of water shrews with the intention of producing habitat management guidelines and producing a database of records to assess the conservation needs of the species. Volunteers were also being asked to search their chosen sites for harvest mouse nests during the winter survey season.
 
Methods: volunteers were asked to go to sites of their choice during the summer (July-September) and during the winter (December-April). Baited tubes (20cm lengths of waste pipe baited with casters) were placed among bankside vegetation. The tubes were collected after two weeks and any scats found are collected and returned to The Mammal Society for identification. Volunteers were asked to survey four or more sites within each survey period, recording habitat information at each site. Negative sites were being noted as well, but were not being treated as ‘confirmed absence’, and survey effort was being noted.
 
Site coverage: results from the first two survey seasons are encouraging. Over 1,000 sites have been surveyed, with water shrews being recorded at 16% of these sites.
 
The fieldwork for The Mammal Society’s Water Shrew Survey ended in September 2005. In four discrete survey seasons, volunteers used the bait tube method to survey 2159 sites across Britain, finding evidence of water shrews at 18% of these. Records came from northern Scotland to the very south of England. The habitat occurrence of water shrews is being assessed using data collected by volunteers and a final report and Conservation Handbook are being produced.
 
Latest information: Although the survey has finished the Mammal Society will continue to collect water shrew records from other sources
 
 

The Vincent Wildlife Trust Polecat and Mink Abundance Monitoring

 
Run and funded by The Vincent Wildlife Trust (VWT)Polecat Mustela putorius © Susan Sharafi/PTES
 
The Vincent Wildlife Trust is not part of the Tracking Mammals Partnership, but has an interest in the work of the Partnership and does a great deal of work for mammal conservation. VWT has participated in funding many single species surveys in the past, including several of the national otter surveys and the national water vole surveys. The Polecat and Mink Abundance Monitoring survey uses data collected by volunteers on the number and distribution of road kills to assess changes in distribution and abundance of the two species. The VWT is also working with The Mammal Society to collect information on the changing distribution of polecats in Britain.
 
Latest information: The polecat survey, run jointly with The Mammal Society, finished at the end of December 2006.
 
 

Irish Hare Surveillance

 

Run by Quercus (Queen's University Belfast), funded by Northern Ireland Environment Agency (NIEA) and the National Parks and Wildlife Service in the Republic of Ireland.

 

The Irish hare (Lepus timidus hibernicus) is an endemic subspecies of the Mountain hare (L. timidus). It differs markedly in phenotype, behaviour and ecology from mountain hares elsewhere and recent genetic research suggests that it is sufficiently distinct to warrant full species status as Lepus hibernicus (Hughes et al. 2006).

 

Game bag records suggest that Irish hare populations were considerably larger during the mid-19th to early 20th century than at present (Reid, 2006). The initiation of Irish hare population declines started during the early 20th century, synchronous with changes in land management practices associated with early agricultural intensification.  Gamebags declined continuously from 1914 to 1970 (Reid, 2006).

 

Direct counts of Irish hares recorded during day-walked transects during the Northern Ireland Rabbit Survey (1986-1995) suggest that the Irish hare population continued to decline throughout the latter half of the 20th century (Reid et al. 2007).

 

The Irish hare attracted major conservation concern after work carried out during the mid-1990s that suggested mean densities had dropped to a low of 0.65 hares per km2 throughout Northern Ireland (Dingerkus & Momtgomery 2002). A Species Action Plan was prepared with targets in line with the Brown hare SAP under the UK Biodiversity Action Plan. The Irish hare Species Action Plan highlighted the necessity for a system of regular, cost-effective monitoring surveys to be put in place.

 

Since 2002, Quercus have conducted annual late winter/early spring night-driven surveys using conventional distance-sampling to assess temporal changes in hare population densities across Northern Ireland. These surveys tentatively suggest that the hare population has increased since the mid-1990s and stabilised at relatively low densities compared to those likely during the 19th century.

 

During 2006/07, Quercus also conducted a hare survey throughout the Republic of Ireland. New field methods and statistical analyses were developed in collaboration with RUWPA at the University of St. Andrews to increase the accuracy and precision of distance derived density estimates. New custom-made distance analyses suggest that conventional models may underestimate densities by 50-70%. During 2007, densities were estimated at 7.66 hares per km2, a number twice that recorded during 2006 suggesting that the Irish hare population is robust enough to undergo an apparent doubling within one year given favourable climatic conditions. Using custom distance-sampling and taking Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland together the total hare population of Ireland during 2007 was estimated at 649,000 hares.

 

All time-series that exist for the Irish hare exhibit substantial interannual fluctuations. Historical gamebag records also exhibit complex multiannual periodicity.  Whilst the mechanisms driving long-term fluctuations remain unclear, delayed density dependence, weather conditions and climatic oscillations have all been implicated. Thus interpretation of short-term changes should be avoided.

 

Survey method: All surveys use spotlight night-driven line transects along which hares are detected at points spaced 200m apart. Annual Northern Ireland surveys use conventional distance analyses to yield fully comparable estimates between years; however, the Republic of Ireland survey used custom-developed distance analysis that was not comparable to previous methods. The latter suggests that conventional distance analysis is not appropriate to estimate hare densities in the Irish landscape and is likely to result in negatively biased estimates. Nevertheless, standardised surveys of Northern Ireland are likely to describe relative temporal change.

 

Site coverage: The Northern Ireland survey utilities 8 long-line transects each 100km in length with at least one in each County. In contrast, the Republic of Ireland survey utilised almost 1000 short-line transects each 1km in length spaced every 10km to given uniform coverage.

 

Latest information:

Northern Ireland Irish Hare Survey 2007

Hare Survey of Ireland 2006-07

References:

Dingerkus, S.K. & Montgomery, W.I. (2002) A review of the status and decline in abundance of the Irish hare (Lepus timidus hibernicus) in Northern Ireland. Mammal review, 32, 1-11.

 

Hall-Aspland, S., Sweeney, O., Tosh, D., Preston., P., Montgomery, W.I. & McDonald, R.A. (2006) Northern IrelandIrish hare survey 2006. Report prepared by Quercus for the Environment and Heritage Service (DOE, N.I.). UK.

 

Hughes, M., Montgomery, W.I. & Prodöhl, P. (2006) Population genetic structure and systematics of the Irish Hare.  Report prepared by Quercus for the Environment and Heritage Service (DOE, N.I.). UK.

 

Preston, J., Prodöhl, P., Portig, A & Montgomery, W.I. (2003) The Northern Ireland Irish Hare Lepus timidus hibernicus Survey 2002.  Report prepared by Queen's University of Belfast for the Environment and Heritage Service (DOE, N.I.). UK.

 

Reid, N. (2006) Theconservation ecology of the Irish hare (Lepus timidus hibernicus). Unpublished PhD thesis. Queen’s University Belfast.

 

Reid, N., Montgomery, W.I. & McDonald, R.A. (2007) Temporal trends in the Irish hare populationReport prepared by Quercus for the Environment and Heritage Service (DOE, N.I.). UK.

 

Reid, N., Sweeney, O., Wilson, C., Preston, S.J., Montgomery, W.I. & McDonald, R.A. (2007c) Developments in hare survey methodology - as applied to the NI Irish hare survey 2007. Report prepared by Quercus for the Environment and Heritage Service (DOE, N.I.). UK.

 

Reid, N., Sweeney, O., Wilson, C., Preston, S.J., & Montgomery, W.I. (2007b) Northern Ireland Irish hare survey 2007. Report prepared by Quercus for the Environment and Heritage Service (DOE, N.I.). UK.

 

Reid, N., Dingerkus, K., Montgomery, W.I., Marnell, F., Jeffrey, R., Lynn, D., Kingston, N. & McDonald, R.A. (2007a) Status of hares in Ireland: Hare Survey of Ireland 2006/07. In Marnell, F. and Kingston, N. (eds) Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 30. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. ISSN 1393 6670.

 

Tosh, D., Towers, R., Preston, J., Portig, A., McDonald, R.A. & Montgomery, W.I. (2004) Northern Ireland Irish hare survey 2004. Report prepared by Quercus for the Environment and Heritage Service (DOE, N.I.). UK.

 

Tosh, D., Brown, S., Preston, J., Montgomery, W.I., Reid, N., Marques, T.A., Borchers, D.L., Buckland, S.T. & McDonald, R.A. (2005) Northern Ireland Irish hare survey 2005. Report prepared by Quercus for the Environment and Heritage Service (DOE, N.I.). UK.

| Home | Site Map | Search | Legal | Feedback | List Access Keys |