
Introduction
This is the eighteenth annual report on the
results of seabird monitoring at colonies throughout Britain and
Ireland, produced jointly by JNCC, RSPB and SOTEAG, as part of
JNCC's Seabird Monitoring Programme. Available data on seabird
breeding numbers and breeding success at seabird colonies in 2006
are summarised and compared with results from previous years,
primarily 2005, with an analysis of longer term trends in the
context of recent findings.
Some findings of particular note in 2006 are summarised
below:
Observers at many seabird colonies throughout
Britain reported a later than average breeding season in
2006. Feeding conditions again appeared to be less than
ideal, with most species probably affected by a shortage of food,
especially during the latter stages of chick-rearing.
It was another late breeding season on
Shetland for red-throated divers, where the number
of pairs nesting was generally high, but success was below average.
On Orkney, the number of pairs nesting was also high and they were
more successful than average. On Eigg, all nests again failed
due to predation by otters.
Northern fulmar numbers
decreased in Orkney and in western Britain between 2005 and 2006,
but increased in Shetland and in eastern Britain. Overall, success
was slightly below the UK and Ireland long-term mean.
Productivity of Manx
shearwaters was below average at the few monitored
colonies. On Rum, it was the latest and most protracted
breeding season since 1969. Crows removed eggs from
accessible burrows on Bardsey. A survey of European
storm-petrel colonies on the Isles of Scilly found 1,398
AOS, similar to that recorded in 2000. Leach’s
storm-petrel numbers on Dun, St. Kilda, were estimated at
13,523 AOS, similar to numbers in 2003, suggesting that the decline
in the size of the UK’s largest colony had at least slowed.
After the decreases in 2005, in response to a
late winter/early spring wreck, great cormorant
and European shag numbers in many eastern regions
increased, but decreases were noted in the west. Breeding
success of European shag was also higher than in 2005 in eastern
regions, but not the west.
After a long period of decline, Arctic
skua numbers in Shetland and Orkney increased for a second
successive year. Breeding success in these regions was higher than
in 2005, despite complete failures at some colonies, but was low in
west Scotland. Great skua breeding success was
higher than in 2005 too, particularly in Shetland.
Mediterranean gulls continued
to increase, with at least 350 pairs fledging approximately 250
young. Black-headed, common and
lesser black-backed gulls also had a poor breeding
season in 2006 with relatively few young fledged in many
regions. Mink activity at colonies in western Scotland was
found to have reduced breeding success of common gulls by 75%,
lesser black-backed gulls by 33% and herring gulls
by 36%.
Black-legged kittiwake
numbers decreased, or remained stable, in most regions although in
SE England numbers were 70% higher than in 2005; the first increase
detected there since 1995. Breeding success was low, except
in NE England. Pipefish were again a major component of food items
brought back to the nest.
Sandwich tern numbers and
breeding success were similar to 2005. Roseate
tern numbers were almost 20% higher than in 2005, due to a
substantial increase at Rockabill, and productivity was high
overall. Common terns had a better breeding season
than in 2005, with higher numbers and breeding success in most
regions. Arctic terns suffered large
declines in Scotland (except in Shetland) and breeding success for
this species, and little tern, was high in Wales
but generally poor elsewhere. Presumed food shortages,
predation, bad weather and tidal inundation were all factors which
depressed tern breeding success in 2006.
Common guillemot numbers were
mostly stable between 2005 and 2006, but declines occurred in a few
western regions of Britain, and in NE Ireland. Regional
trends have been mostly positive since 1986 although declines have
occurred in Scotland recently. Mean productivity was, after
2004 and 2005, the third lowest recorded.
Razorbill numbers in plots increased in Orkney,
but decreased, or at least remained stable, in most regions since
2005. Whole-colony counts indicated increases in eastern regions,
and in NW England, but numbers in most western regions
declined. For the third successive year mean breeding success
was markedly lower than the long-term average. Productivity
was particularly low in colonies in the Northern Isles and
Wales.
Black guillemot numbers in
Shetland and Orkney were stable between 2005 and 2006.
However, numbers have halved in Orkney since 1986, although there
has been virtually no change in numbers in Shetland over this
time. Atlantic puffin breeding success was
near average in 2006. However, success was low on Fair Isle and St.
Kilda, although at the last site productivity was double that of
2005, which was the worst season recorded there.
The information contained in this report has
been collated from many sources. These include research staff and
wardens from a variety of organisations including RSPB, SOTEAG,
JNCC, Scottish Natural Heritage, English Nature, Countryside
Council for Wales, Irish National Parks and Wildlife Service, the
Wildlife Trusts, bird observatories, National Trust and National
Trust for Scotland, the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology and
BirdWatch Ireland. Many dedicated fieldwork volunteers also
contribute valuable data to the Seabird Monitoring Programme; refer
to the Acknowledgements section for details.
One aim of the annual report is to draw
attention to notable changes in seabird numbers or breeding
performance, which may merit direct conservation action or further
research. It is also intended to provide feedback and, we hope,
encouragement for future work, to the many individuals and
organisations contributing data, by placing results for individual
colonies or regions in a wider context. The results presented refer
mainly to coastal or island populations of seabirds, but reference
is also made to inland populations of great cormorants, gulls and
terns where data are available.
Any comments on this report, or offers of help
for future years, would be greatly appreciated by the authors. We
are also keen to receive any existing additional information on
numbers or breeding success for any seabird species, whether at
coastal or inland colonies, which may not have been previously
submitted to the Seabird Monitoring Programme. Any such data will
be added to the long term seabird databases maintained by JNCC and
RSPB, including the JNCC/Seabird Group Seabird Colony Register.
Details of recommended methods for assessing
seabird numbers and breeding success are given in the Seabird
monitoring handbook for Britain and Ireland (Walsh et al.
1995). Copies of the Handbook, or other advice on seabird
monitoring methodology, may be obtained from the Seabirds and
Cetaceans.